Authoritarian, yes. But transparent nonetheless. - Kitana, b.Itter s.Weet sym.Phony, The Final Post, April 17 2007.
Back on April Fools’ Day, I wrote about how the Singapore blogosphere is losing its vitality; now akikonomu, the former high priestess of Ise, has already written its epitaph, an ode to rampaging infants. Even back when I started blogging, there were whispers that things weren’t as good as they used to me. Soci, then Steven McDermott, famously ranted long and hard about the “infantile sub-intelligentsia nonsense” permeating the ether.
But now the infants are winning. The great practitioners of online political discourse have declined into moribund obscurity, or sought out other, more rewarding, pursuits. Singabloodypore itself has degenerated into a post-and-boast groupblog. The old Singapore Angle is busy with his second child (congratulations!), while the new Singapore Angle is trapped in its self-pleasing, obsessive groupthink over academic rigor as applied to things that really don’t deserve such standards. Molly Meek’s feline invective somehow seems less vituperative of current affairs and has taken on the tone of self-indugent mockery, in exasperation over her1 inability to satirize the absurd truth. Even Mr Wang has tired of his self-effusing posts on how stupid the Singapore government can be at times, and has made a subtle shift toward “a new thematic focus” as announced on March 30. And in the past six months there has been a noticeable string of prominent self-imposed rigors mortis: Yuen Chung Kwong (December 1), Gayle Goh (January 28), Kitana (April 13), Zyberzitizen (April 18), and now sieteocho (May 1). Vox Leo, by my measure, has joined the ranks of the officially moribund, having last posted on August 22 2006. En & Hou (of Students’ Sketchpad fame) have yet to make good on their promise to “see you after the ‘A’ levels“. And Kway Teow Man’s personal blog seems to have been abandoned since sometime in March.
Unlike the L’Enfant that built the great architectural masterpieces of Washington DC’s National Mall, the infants now overrunning the Singapore blogosphere are killing it through apathetic karma. Sure, it’s not like the infants are engaging in wanton destruction, but on the rare occasions they leave their self-enraptured bubble of photos, linkwhoring ^o^~~~ posts to various offline friends and their pink Comic Sans CSS stylesheets, they tend to form the incessant, one-dimensional chorus of “cannot lah!”
The Great Affective Divide has made inroads online, threatening to render the governors and the governed even further apart. Not only has the Government consistently practiced selective hearing, in responding only to what it thinks worth responding to, it has maintained its heavy-handed approach to micromanagement. In its way it is learning - long ago the official stance was that blogs were “online diaries” too insignificant to be worth monitoring. Now the name of the game seems to be “watch and monitor”. At least they’re paying attention now - rumors even have it that certain persons on government payroll are paid to do nothing other than read blogs and write reports about them!
Singapore political parties and politicians are finally waking up to the potential of the blogosphere for civil debate, and some have enthusiastically jumped into the foray. NMP Siew Kum Hong is perhaps the best example of an independent establishing an online soapbox, and has provided us, in his typical candid manner, a rare insight into what exactly it is that MPs do for a living. The established PAP has continued to build political beachheads on online terra incognita - witness the onset of p65.sg and the Young PAP blog. Posts on these blogs, such as the curiously titled post “Bill Gates+George Soros+Mother Theresa - How Much $$” by Elaina Olivia Chong of March 24, are an unprecedented window into the inner thoughts of the next generation of PAP politicians and of the new cadre members who will support them into a murky future. But others are quick to prevent a monopoly of PAP partisan voiced online. In particular, the Workers’ Party has been aggressively expanding its online activities through operating a significant number of personal party members’ blogs. WP members have also started their own unofficial initiatives, such as The Hammer Sphere and the The Online Citizen, the latter ostensibly operating in a nonpartisan manner. At the same time, Ephraim Loy’s brave experiment to share his blog with MP George Yeo seems to have gone nowhere, owing to enthusiasm giving way to lackluster posts about nothing particularly interesting.
Paradoxically, as nonpartisan blogs representing the citizenry continue on their downward decline in quality and number, the number of blogs belonging to politicians, prominent civil servants, and political parties seem to be on the rise. This is perhaps not particularly surprising, since the latter is starting from practically nothing; on the other hand, it is of genuine concern that prominent bloggers are bowing out. Are there enough of them to form a pattern? I certainly think so - many of those who’ve moved on have either stepped on some Higher Up’s toes or decided that it is not worth the trouble of updating their blogs. I think it’s symptomatic of a general weltschmerz, some dulling mix of despair mixed with weariness. It speaks of how even the most optimistic hopes have faltered in the post-Bhavani era; that no matter how well-intentioned, it is difficult to blog in a climate of FUD where one’s legal rights and knowhow to avoid getting arrested or slapped with a lawsuit override the calling to speak out. Sooner or later, it seems, the unruly, nonpartisan, nonaligned bloggers find better things to do with their time than engage in an increasingly risky pastime which necessitates dodging both trolls and legal minefields.
To be fair, not everyone has thrown in the towel. Alex Au gamely treads on at Yawning Bread, as does Chemical Generation and the ever-enigmatic Xenoboy, to mention but a few of the community who are still around, but tend to be underappreciated in recent days. Trowa Evans (The Police State) is finally back after a half-year hiatus. Insane Polygons has found new life as a cartoonist with his popular Elite Girl series still going strong, joining Sei-ji rakugaki as the only two regular political cartoonists that . Two (relative) newcomers - Intelligent Singaporean and SingaporeSurf - and their regulars, are the only aggregators worth anything these days. And the karmic cycle of online reincarnation may very well bring back some of the Old Masters. We also welcome new bloggers into the fold, such as Charissa, who is beginning to establish her voice online as a little fish finding her way into the world. Speranza Nuova has done well in his new blogger identity. And of course Lao Zha Bor (老查某) deserves special mention for her meteoritic rise to fame following positive coverage in the MSM.
But will this influx of new development be sufficient to rescue the Singapore blogosphere from its moribund state? Find out in the next SotSB.
Footnotes- Rumor has it that Molly Meek is really written by a he, but I will reference only the gender of the persona to avoid semantic complications.↩
I think non-partisan blogs are bowing down because election times has passed behind - hence currently there’s no viable way to channel dissatisfaction against government. I’m sure they will return close in full throttle to election. In the meantime, the politicians blogs are on the rise because they might like to start far early before election. But again, I may be wrong.
That’s an interesting perspective. But if true, it would imply that the number of such blogs must have also increased *because* it was election season too. Clearly there were some blogs like Singapore Election Watch that were started specifically for the election season, with election-specific content that clearly wouldn’t be so interesting now. But how representative is S.E.W. in reflecting how post-election season is responsible for the decline in such blogs?
Maybe we are entering a plateau after the big bang of the elections in 2005 and the post adrenaline growth in 2006. I think it would be unrealistic to expect everyone to write something “not-infantile” every other day. Do it for too long and you burn out like Kitana and Gayle, which is a tremendous loss to us. Maybe we are partly to blame when we constantly expect every post from these bloggers to be as eloquent and thought provoking as the last.
I think this is a natural evolution. When someone steps down, others will step up, maybe in a different form, or speaking in a different yet similar tune.
Anyway, I think theonlinecitizen should not be labelled as part of the Workers’ Party. After all, they started out as YoungRepublic, it’s just that the webmaster is a member of the WP’s Youth Wing.
For completeness, I will record here that Mr Wang has picked up on my post here, and I have already posted one comment there.
jdtoh:
nitpicky point - the election season was more accurately may/june 2006.
You bring up a good point about good bloggers setting higher expectations for themselves with every good post they write. Clearly the obsession with perfection is, as you said, unsustainable. The way I deal with it is just to not expect every post to turn out to be good. If Thomas Edison supposedly took 10,000 tries to get the first light bulb working, then 9,999 crappy posts and 1 good post should be good enough for anyone.
It’s hard to maintain a blog - it takes quite a bit of time to write, edit, moderate and respond to comments. It’s noteworthy that the greatest attrition appears to be among JC students and university students…
celluloidreality(s),
I hope you’re right about this being part of the natural state of things. But it also bugs me that the blogosphere appears to be running out of original things to say.
WRT theonlinecitizen, I did mention that bit in a footnote. I prefer to err on the side of questioning the possible existence of a political agenda versus people not realizing that it is run by a party member.
Wow, I get mentioned in the same breath as Gayle Goh and Kitana.
I quit because I found myself spending too much time online. It’s better and healthier to spend more time in the real world. Blogging is really ploughing a lone furrow.
If you want to participate in politics, it’s better to get paid for it, like in the US you have your think tanks. Or you are a lobbyist. Or you are working in a congressional or senate committee.
Or maybe you can write papers to journals, or write opinion pieces, build up your academic reputation, whatever.
What’s in it for you when you blog? Release. So what happens after what’s supposed to be released is released?
I remember that somebody mentioned that the blogging phenomenon will die down after its peak in Singapore (circa 2005-06). And so it comes to pass.
How many of you have watched the first transformers movie in the 80s? There was a part about the junkions? We are all junkions.
Oh by the way you throw in the towel when you want to give up. You throw down the gauntlet when you are challenging somebody to a duel. You don’t throw in the gauntlet.
Hi Elia,
Please do allow me to correct some things here - both in your article and in the comments section - about theonlinecitizen (TOC).
You said: “the Workers’ Party has been aggressively expanding its online activities through The Online Citizen.”
This is incorrect.
As is posted on theonlinecitizen blog itself, TOC is not an initiative of the Workers’ Party. Thus, it is not true that the WP “has been aggressively expanding its online acitivites” through theonlinecitizen.
TOC is a personal blog - with contributions from ordinary singaporeans.
The Hammersphere is also not a WP official initiative. It is stated rather clearly in the blog itself too.
I would also like to correct Celluloid Reality(s) point that theonlinecitizen is run by a member of the WP Youth Wing and that theonlinecitizen started off as The Young Republic.
TOC is run by me but I am not a member of the WP Youth Wing. In fact, I never have been.
Also, TOC never started out as The Young Republic - although the founders of TYR are contributing as writers from time to time (Choo Zheng Xi and Koh Jie Kai).
I hope this clarifies things.
Good write up on the state of the blogosphere. My own view is that the Singapore blogosphere is still at the infant stage of development.
So, attrition is expected.
Regards,
Andrew
theonlinecitizen
I think my original rant was that there had yet to be a ‘golden age’ of the Sg blogosphere, not that there used to be. As for the infants now winning I agree, however I see it in a different light, it is those who argue for ‘objectivity, fairness, unbiased and personal accounts’ of their lives that are winning. In a regime that prides itself in de-politicisation of the polity then yes there has been a shift towards non-political narratives. But surely this is an acceptance of the Singaporean hegemony, so while the political blogs and aggregator blogs continue to be busy building resistance identities rather than project identities, the Singapore blogosphere is nothing other than a bunch of predominantly middle-class, university educated males constructing a space for self-referential echo chambers - myself included.
Andrew, apologies for the mixup with the WP identity. Thanks for clearing things up.
Cheers!
CR
Hi CR,
No problem..
Regards,
Andrew
theonlinecitizen
sieteocho,
I’ve fixed the gauntlet thing. As you can see my QC isn’t very good
I’m not criticising your choice to quit, it was simply to mention that such-and-such people have all decided to stop.
As for the participation in politics thing, I don’t believe in the clear dichotomy of “Either get involved (and be paid for it), or don’t and keep quiet.” In any functioning democracy, there has to be a continuum of participation in order for the whole thing to work. Yes, we tend to be merely pundits, but at least for myself I have better things to do than join the club. I once did, and fat lot of good that did me.
andrew,
I’ve rewritten the bit referring to TOC and Hammersphere. I think it should be more accurate now. Sorry about that.
soci,
Did I ever say there used to be a ‘golden age’? Maybe the context is just misleading.
So you think we as a collective whole are moving toward narcissism and disengagement from public affairs? Perhaps I have fallen prey to conflating political and civic affairs, but it sure seems to me that people have simply stopped short of anything beyond whining/bitching about the latest “unfair” government policies. Even two years ago there weren’t that many bloggers willing to go the extra step of offering their own critical analyses, and the ranks of these are dwindling rapidly. *That* is what I’m lamenting.
“Acceptance” of the reigning hegemony? It’s a strange kind of acceptance, this passive unenthusiastic “like that lor” attitude that permeates Singapore culture. The danger I see is that people willing to speak out will be increasingly branded as troublemakers even more vehemently than before.
As for “self-referential echo chambers”, I have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m sure MY blog is the premier destination to find out what it’s like to be a maverick from the establishment.
moribound? some may be blogging under another name, you know…
just wrote this on my own blog
—————–
the disappearing blogs
Ever since computers changed from early generation computational tools to the middle generation data handling tools (Fortran to Cobol transition), sociologists have been arguing about their impact on power distribution in organizations and in society generally: would they promote free thinking and democratic processes by increasing the availability of information, or would they provide more efficient control mechanisms for those in power? The same argument is being repeated today with blogs versus organized mass media: everyone can freely express himself/herself, but would this actually produce bottom up consensus, or merely make it easier to manipulate this from above?
Let me describe my own experience as a blogger. As you can see by going to the root blog asiayouthmedia.com and exploring various links, I have written on a wide variety of topics, truly living up to the free-ranging nature of blogging; in particular, I am genuinely bilingual, and have the experience to discuss sensitive topics in a safe yet informative manner. In theory, these writings should have considerable appeal (one example, if you search on google on a number of topics I covered using both English and Chinese words, my articles would often appear, e.g., kra canal 克拉运河, because such bilingual discussions are rare), but the page view numbers do not support this. In other words, web surfers might say they are interested in particular topics, but do not do what they say. We know only too well that the very popular sites were those with revealing photos, like SPG last year, Michelle Quek this year, and very recently, when a couple in Taiwan put their love making photos on the web without adequte security protection, they had ten thousand hits in a matter of minutes before the photos were taken down.
In blogsphere it is easy to talk but hard to be heard, unless you are some kind of celebrity or power figure. Occasionally a blog might become popular for a transitional reason, e.g., when Philip Yeo had his quarrels with Chen Jiahao, but they tend to die down. In the mean time, the official mass media stick around, with staying power lying in their income from advertising income, so that they can support teams of reporters to acquire local news, obtain early access to international news, provide analytical editorial writings, and present these in some form of attention arousing package, in a way amateur, unpaid bloggers cannot compete with. The official media, however, do not always do this well or do it economically, which ought to give bloggers encouragement, that they can do a better job; the question is how long they can keep it up.
Comfortably retired, I can afford to spend time, and a small amount of money, registering a whole pile of website names and yapping away on anything that interests me but I doubt many others can follow my example. It is easy to become discouraged and give up.
return to blog start sgsociety.com to index blog.360.yahoo.com/sgpsociety?p=1
Yoz Elia, nice piece! Can’t wait for the next state of the blogs address. Hmmmm But prolly those bloggers who stopped writing, they would storm back when the Bat Signal is in the sky. When the next perceived crisis crashes into us, bet the usual suspects who “retired” would emerge again. Hooyah.
This entry got so many big words that I feel like I’m reading a sociology article - using big words to make sense of the world - well done though. I think there’s no need to be pessimistic, this a period of enlightenment - where the French use to debate, argue and give speeches in salons and cafes - Singaporeans are using the likes of blogs and forums to exchange ideas or impose their ideas on others. While some will rise and falter, I am almost certain that others will ride on the next wave to come up with something new or much better.
Hi Elia,
Thanks for the re-write. Much appreciated.
Regards,
Andrew
theonlinecitizen
soci:
But surely this is an acceptance of the Singaporean hegemony, so while the political blogs and aggregator blogs continue to be busy building resistance identities rather than project identities, the Singapore blogosphere is nothing other than a bunch of predominantly middle-class, university educated males constructing a space for self-referential echo chambers - myself included.
There just isn’t enough of a confidence and independence of mind in many Singaporeans to actually stand fast for something that isn’t merely reactive. That being so there is no reason why organisation would elude them any less online than offline. I think Gayle Goh tried, but even she got sidetracked into the reaction game and I think anyway you can’t really achieve this without a community of some shared values, some kind of manifesto (however open) for several people to rally around. But then you expose yourself to the threat of ‘engaging in politics’ and however much these bloggers kid themselves otherwise, they’re all afraid. They’ve got comfortable lives - why threaten that? Again, as it is offline, so it is online.
Personally, I’ve been pressured several times to join one ‘group blog’ or another but I have honestly zero interest unless there is a group which is able to articulate what it stands for in a way that I share, beyond some empty notion of “objective commentary”. So instead we have a collective of atomised individuals who mostly share only their frustration. The only identifiable positive programme I’ve heard put forward coherently amongst certain Singaporean bloggers is minarchic libertarianism of some stripe and perhaps for obvious reasons people like that aren’t collectively political (and since I disagree with them I have no interest in trying to organise them). So I’ve just opted for infantilism altogether.
[...] Diodati says Singapore’s blogosphere is loosing its steam. The blogger rounds up the current status of once very active bloggers. Share [...]
Charissa’s not a new blogger, heh. She’s of my “generation”.
“self-pleasing, obsessive groupthink over academic rigor”
Might some academic rigor have staved off threats of legal action under the old, defunct, AcidFlask ancien regime?
Andrew of The Online Citizen wrote: “TOC is run by me but I am not a member of the WP Youth Wing. In fact, I never have been.”
But on Mr Wang’s blog, Andrew has previously written:
“I am a WP member”
http://mrwangsaysso.blogspot.com/2007/02/leaks-squealers.html#comment-854368707489384848
Could somebody please clarify this? Is it a bit hairsplitting to say one is not a WP Youth Wing member, when one actually is a WP member.
Sounds like Bill Clinton saying oral sex isn’t actually sex.
Actually I miss the old Mr Wang. Sigh.
Gayle,
I’ve only started reading Charissa recently, so I forgot that she’s actually been around for quite a bit too. My bad, hehe.
The Gnawing True Fisher,
I’ve deleted some of your duplicate comments. In the future please be more patient until I get the chance to rescue any comments stuck in moderation.
State of the Singapore Blogosphere, May 2007 « e pur si muove - recherche en dépaysement…
按: 新加坡網誌圈現狀檢視, 與港網誌圈多有雷同之處…
[...] is a response to Elia Diodati’s post on the State of the Blogosphere. Freedom house has just released their annual press freedom rankings for the year 2007. Singapore [...]
Hi there. Actually I think this whole attempt to tie the leaving of bloggers together into a coherent analysis of the blogosphere is somewhat falsely meta-narrative. People come, people go, and for very different reasons.
For instance, I might say the blogosphere is flagging because of too much pettiness, in-fighting, cowardice, self-glorification and delusions of grandeur. But I’m sure another blogger would say it’s because of a feeling of ineptness and inability to effect change. Another person would say it’s just writer’s block.
Really, there are lots of different reasons, sometimes they coincide, sometimes not. Personally I think when the time is right and the issue is hot, the keyboards will race again. In the meantime, the blogosphere is just like life. People come, people go, and it’s a bitch!
-Gayle
“Actually I think this whole attempt to tie the leaving of bloggers together into a coherent analysis of the blogosphere is somewhat falsely meta-narrative.”
Surely you could level the same criticism against any and all histories that weren’t written from an omniscient point of view. Does that mean, then, that all such histories are worthless?
As you said, people have their own reasons to blog, and their own reasons to not blog. But what I’m after is the possibility of a statistically significant exodus. The reasons and activities of individual tend to cancel out over statistical averages, but it is entirely possible for a statistical imbalance one way or another to be meaningful despite not being able to explain the actions of every single individual. From my own highly opinionated POV it seems that Something is happening to the collective blogosphere; whether it is merely some kind of settling down after the hype or something more ominous remains to be seen.
Does my narrative accomplish such a statistical analysis? No. But I hoped for it to provoke people into thinking about it, and to that end the results have been rather satisfactory.
[...] State of the Singapore Blogosphere, May 2007 Meta [...]
WP member not = WP Youth Wing member. Means Andrew is not young enough, you stupid! Compare to what Bill Clinton shit? Lousy example!